REPLY TO CHAPMAN: MISREPRESENTATION IN STAPLETON'S COMMENTARY

Commentary: “Rabies in Iranian Traditional Medicine” & Reply to Commentary on “Rabies in Iran: Past, Present and Future”

Constructivism and Development: Reply to Smith’s Commentary

This article is a reply to the commentary made by Smith (1998) regarding these authors’ earlier article (1998), which proposes a modified constructivist account of the origins of mental representation. This article focuses on three aspects of Smith’s commentary. First, we elaborate on Smith’s discussion of differences between empiricist and constructivist approaches to development. Second, we d...

commentary: “rabies in iranian traditional medicine” & reply to commentary on “rabies in iran: past, present and future”

0

Commentary: sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino

Messinger et al. found a 3.18 odds ratio of male to female ASD recurrence in 1241 prospectively followed high-risk (HR) siblings. Among high-risk siblings (with and without ASD), as well as among 583 low-risk controls, girls exhibited higher performance on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, as well as lower restricted and repetitive behavior severity scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observatio...

Author's reply to the commentary by Gilpin et al.